I am really glad we did this ARP workshop, I thought it was very helpfull. Being the reviewer was actually harder to me than being reviewed. I think this because I am not a good writer so I usually don't like critiquing someone else's paper not really knowing what I'm talking about. It did help me become a better peer editor though. I know know alot of the problems to look for and even though I didn't correct everything I think that I did a good job. What I didn't like about being the reviewer is that we had to keep talking the whole time. Even though our group members would say alot of what I wanted to say we would still just repeat alot of the same comments.
What I enjoyed about being reviewed on is that I got to hear what everyone thought about my paper. Even though I didn't agree at times it was still interesting. I actually thought it was kind of funny not to be able to talk. I understand that it so you can listen to what they are telling you but some things were stuff that needed to be explained. That is what I did not like about the review process, the fact that we couldn't defend ourselves. Other than all of that I really found this helpfull and I am happy we did this.
No comments:
Post a Comment